Aerial view of a solar farm in green fields
For claims and reports · ISO/IEC 17029 · ISO 14065

Greenhouse Gas Validation and Verification

Accredited validation and verification of greenhouse gas statements, carbon footprints and environmental claims to ISO/IEC 17029 and ISO 14065, giving regulators, lenders, investors and buyers an independent opinion they can rely on.

  • Accredited by EGAC
  • ISO 14064-3 verification
  • Limited or reasonable assurance
Member of Dubai SME
General requirements for validation and verification bodies
ISO/IEC 17029
Requirements for bodies validating and verifying environmental information
ISO 14065
Specification for the verification and validation of GHG statements
ISO 14064-3
Competence requirements for validation and verification teams
ISO 14066
ISO/IEC17029Validation and verificationAccredited
Accreditation

Accredited by EGAC, the Egyptian Accreditation Council

Validation and Verification · ISO/IEC 17029 and ISO 14065

Validation and verification of greenhouse gas statements in accordance with ISO 14064-3, for organisational inventories to ISO 14064-1 and projects to ISO 14064-2, with team competence to ISO 14066.

Accreditation details

Schedule number to be added

Validation

Is a forward-looking claim reasonable?

  • GHG reduction and removal projects
  • Projected emission reductions
  • Targets and transition plans
Verification

Is a historical claim accurate?

  • Annual organisational GHG inventories
  • Achieved reductions and removals
  • Product carbon footprints
Process

How it works

Each stage is planned and confirmed with you in advance.

  1. Step 01

    Agreement

    The objective, scope, criteria, level of assurance and materiality are agreed in writing.

  2. Step 02

    Strategic analysis and planning

    Risk assessment, sampling plan and evidence-gathering plan, based on the nature of the claim.

  3. Step 03

    Evidence gathering

    Data trails, calculations, controls and records are tested, with site visits where required.

  4. Step 04

    Independent review

    A competent reviewer, not involved in the engagement, reviews the evidence and the conclusion.

  5. Step 05

    Statement

    A validation or verification statement and report are issued.

FAQ

Common questions

Do you prepare GHG inventories or carbon footprints?

No. A verification body cannot verify information it has helped to prepare. Your inventory may be prepared by your own team or by any consultant, and GQCL then provides the independent verification.

What is the difference between limited and reasonable assurance?

Reasonable assurance is a high, but not absolute, level of assurance based on extensive evidence gathering, and is expressed as a positive opinion. Limited assurance involves less extensive procedures and is expressed as a conclusion that nothing has come to the verifier's attention to indicate a material misstatement. The applicable programme or the intended user normally specifies the level required.

How long does a verification take?

Duration depends on the organisational boundary, the number of sites and emission sources, the level of assurance and the quality of the data. Your proposal sets out the planned verification days and the timeline from submission of data to issue of the statement.

Which reporting frameworks do you verify against?

GHG statements are verified to ISO 14064-3 against the criteria you report under, such as ISO 14064-1, ISO 14064-2 or the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard, together with any programme-specific rules.

Will our verification statement be accepted by UAE authorities?

Acceptance depends on the programme. For voluntary disclosure and for lender, investor and supply chain requirements, verification by an EGAC-accredited body to ISO 14065 is recognised internationally. Regulated UAE schemes apply their own approval or registration rules for verifiers, and we confirm the position for your scheme before the engagement begins.

What is materiality?

Materiality is the threshold above which errors, omissions or misrepresentations could affect the decisions of intended users. It is agreed at the start of the engagement, often as a percentage of total reported emissions, and determines the extent of testing.

Get a QuoteAsk an Advisor